![]() One or two days after I left, they came to my house, and I wasn’t there. As a result, Moscow said it has gathered hundreds of thousands of orphans and vulnerable children there, taking them back to Russia.Ukraine says the practice amounts to forced deportation to erase their Ukrainian identity.That’s a crime against humanity – something Putin has already been indicted for by the International Criminal Court in the Hague."I knew I had to leave, because they would have taken me to Russia, given me a Russian passport, and sent me to an orphanage. After that, no possible agreements can work and it is very hard to get the child back."President Vladimir Putin claims to have annexed Russian-occupied parts of Ukraine. They assign a guardian or place the child into an adoptive family. The Russians assign a legal guardian to them to replace the previous guardian they had on Ukrainian territory. Or kill me: there have been such cases."Her father died of AIDS last month - leaving her - and her younger brother Maksym - orphans.and making them part of a particularly vulnerable group amid the war.Orphans are the most urgent cases for groups like Save Ukraine -a charity that maintains an underground network inside occupied parts of Ukraine - and Russia itself."It is much harder to bring back an orphan child. I couldn't go anywhere, because my father was worried. STORY: Sixteen-year-old Ilona Pavliuk is describing the moment she returned home - to Ukraine.She's spent nearly a year and a half locked away - hiding under Russian occupation.The Russians came to their village near the Dnipro River at the start of the invasion last year.She says she couldn't leave the house - not even to the park just outside their home."I wasn't studying, I haven't finished school. The next day, Muhyiddin insisted he had been responsible for executing this decision in 2021, accusing Anwar of lying to claim credit.Īnwar responded by saying Muhyiddin’s administration had only agreed to the debt waiver, but never followed through with it, which was why he could still do it now in 2023.Īmong other things, Anwar said the funds for the programme were only allocated in the Budget 2023 that he tabled in February, and were nowhere to be seen in either Budget 2021 or 2022. The day before, Muhyiddin sent a letter of demand to Anwar seeking an apology and retraction for claiming the former did not implement a debt waiver scheme for Felda settlers, which had to be done within 24 hours.įailure to comply would see Muhyiddin’s lawyers begin a defamation lawsuit against Anwar. Yesterday, Malay Mail sighted documents that showed Anwar had signed off RM990 million on June 27 this year as part of the agreement to waive the Felda settlers’ debt.Īnwar urged Muhyiddin to apologise over the latter’s prior claim that he was the one that executed the decision to waive Felda settlers’ debt. ![]() ![]() Muhyiddin claimed that the documents produced by Anwar do not prove that the latter was telling the truth but the reverse, adding that the said documents were actually regarding an agreement issuing government-guaranteed sukuk. The Perikatan Nasional (PN) chairman and Anwar have been locked in arguments on which of them should be the one taking credit for the scheme to cancel the Felda settlers’ debt. ![]() ![]() Earlier today, Muhyiddin had insisted that it was him and not Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim who had waived the Felda settlers’ debt, saying that he will proceed with his defamation lawsuit against Anwar. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |